Prudent Planning

February 2, 2009

Our Veterans

Filed under: Military, financial, planning — Richard Barid @ 10:42 pm
Tags: , , ,

Along with about 86,000,000 of my closest friends (according to Neilsen numbers), I got out my chips & salsa, my wings & hot sauce, and my Prilosec & Rolaids last night. I sat down to watch the spectacular production that is the NFL’s championship football game.

In addition to the necessary players from each team and referee, there was a seeming cast of thousands (ok, maybe dozens) at center field for the coin toss. Tossing that coin, as I’m sure many of you saw, was the current Commander, U.S. Central Command, General David Petraeus. His participation and the always-breathtaking pass by the Blue Angels got me thinking about our men and women in harm’s way.

Wait! Don’t click away from this post yet! This is not a dissertation on the merits of the War on Terror. It is not a diatribe about our military action in Iraq or Afghanistan. Regardless of your politics, your thoughts on use of military force, or your politics – most of us can agree that we should do our best to stand by those serving in our armed forces. Part of the way we do that in our country is by providing certain benefits and services to our veterans through the Veteran’s Administration or VA.

Aid and Attendance is a part of those benefits of which many people have never heard. The VA Aid and Attendance program is for veterans and surviving spouses. It is in place to assure certain funding for these veterans and their spouses to get the assistance they need in basic, daily living activities (eating, dressing, bathing, etc.). Depending on circumstances, there may also be funds available to help these veterans and spouses who are in nursing care or assisted living facilities.

Not unlike Medicaid (another government benefits program), VA Aid and Attendance has its own set of regulations and hoops which much be jumped through to qualify. There are choices to be made and disclosures (regarding assets) which must occur properly. Also, like Medicaid, VA Aid and Attendance has certain maximum assets a person may have and still qualify.

If you or someone you love has a need for such benefits and is a veteran (or spouse of a veteran) it makes sense to speak with a professional who has knowledge in the area. Even if current asset levels are too high, there are often things an estate planning attorney can do to position those assets correctly and help the veteran and/or spouse to qualify for the benefits to which he or she is entitled.

From all of us at Smith Barid, LLC, we offer our sincere thanks to those who have served, and those who are serving, our country in our armed forces.

April 15, 2007

Help for Our Armed Forces

Filed under: Basic Estate Planning, IRA, Living Trust, Military, Retirement Planning, planning — Michael Smith @ 6:24 pm

American military personnel serving in combat zones have enough to worry about. They put their lives at risk every day, in hostile territory, while doing what they are called to do.

The compensation they earn while stationed in the combat zone is excludible from gross income. In other words, it’s tax-free. This applies to all enlisted personnel and warrant officers for any month they served (even in part) in the combat zone. In addition, it covers any month during which they were hospitalized as a result of wounds, disease, or injury incurred in a combat zone (up until two years after the cessation of combat). Even officers’ pay in a combat zone is tax-free, up to the maximum amount of pay for enlisted personnel.

This seems like a great deal, but there are a few caveats. Even though you do not pay tax on the combat-zone pay, you must include it in calculating your qualification for the earned income tax credit and the refundable portion of the child tax credit.

Until recently, if you only had tax-free combat-zone pay, you could not fund an Individual Retirement Account, otherwise known as an IRA, because all your pay would have been excluded from gross income. You must have income from work, or “earned income” in order to make an IRA contribution. Since all the combat-zone pay was excluded from gross income, it did not count as earned income either. A rule that had been meant to benefit our military personnel had inadvertently hurt them.

A new law was passed and signed on May 26, 2006, which provided that, for purposes of figuring eligibility for contributing to an IRA (or Roth IRA), the combat-zone pay can be considered part of earned income. The Heroes Earned Retirement Opportunities (“HEROs”) Act is effective retroactively for 2004 and 2005. You have until May 28, 2009 to make contributions for those years. Also, if you decide to make a contribution for those years, you can still claim a tax refund resulting from that contribution for up to another year. For tax years 2006 and later, military personnel with combat-zone pay are under the normal rules and deadlines.

Now, our men and women in uniform can save for retirement even while fighting for us in a combat zone. Finally, Congress has passed something for which we can all cheer! If you or a loved one is in a combat zone, such as Iraq or Afghanistan, contact a qualified estate planning attorney to discuss how to plan for retirement and the future in general.

A qualified estate planning attorney can help you make sure you get the full benefit of your combat pay. (www.smithbarid.com).

March 2, 2007

Government Helps Fighting Men and Women to Secure Retirement

Filed under: IRA, Military, Retirement Planning, planning — Richard Barid @ 7:01 pm

Service members receiving combat pay now have a rare opportunity to put away money for retirement and, in some cases, to get tax refunds for years that have already passed. The Heroes Earned Retirement Opportunities Act (HERO Act) was signed by President Bush on May 29, 2006. Prior to the HERO Act, service members with little or no earned income other than combat pay could contribute very little or no money to an IRA.

The new law recognizes that combat pay (which is not subject to income tax under the Internal Revenue Code) does count as compensation for IRA contribution purposes. This means that many thousands of fighting men and women can now contribute their hard-earned combat pay (and other earnings) to an IRA (an individual retirement account).

The Act gives service members who received non-taxable combat pay in 2004 and/or 2005 until May 29, 2009 to make IRA contributions for those years. Service members will also be able to make IRA contributions for 2006 and subsequent years. The time limit for IRA contributions for tax year 2006 is April 15, 2007.

Total annual IRA contributions are limited by law. The contribution limit for 2004 is $3,000 (or $3,500 for those age 50 and older). The contribution limit for 2005 is $4,000 (or $4,500 for those age 50 and older). The contribution limit for 2006 also $4,000 (or $5,000 for those age 50 and older).

Due to extensions of income tax return filing deadlines for those in combat zones, some service members have not yet filed 2004 and 2005 tax returns. Military combatants in this category can simply report their IRA contributions when the returns are filed. Service members who contribute to 2004 and/or 2005 IRAs, and have already filed returns for those years, should seek the help of a tax professional to amend their 2004 and 2005 returns. In many cases, such amended returns will result in additional refunds for the service members and their families.

Whether it means thousands of dollars in additional refunds, or just the important chance to sock away tax-free dollars toward retirement, the HERO Act creates an excellent opportunity for all service members whose earnings are primarily tax-free combat pay. A full-service estate planning firm can help you to make the right decision for your retirement and your family (www.smithbarid.com).

Whether your money is earned in combat for your country or not, it is critical to know the importance of saving for retirement. In fact, if you put $1,000 away for someone graduating from college today, it would be worth over $72,000 by the time they start collecting social security. (This assumes graduation at age 22, social security at age 67, and a 10% rate of return.) Albert Einstein called the power of compounding the eighth wonder of the world.

Today’s workers can accomplish this retirement savings with pre-tax dollars in their 401k or IRA. But, what happens when the time comes and you withdraw the money? The entire withdrawal is subject to income tax. If you die and leave your 401k or IRA to your children or other beneficiaries, it is taxable upon withdrawal by them. Further, if you die with more than $2 million, including your retirement assets, the balance of the retirement plan before the impact of income tax will be included in determining the tax on your estate.

The combined effect of estate and income taxation could result in the majority of the assets going to pay taxes. For example, assets over $2 million are estate taxed at 45%. In addition, if some of the assets are withdrawn to pay the estate tax, the withdrawal would incur federal and state income tax of as much as 35% or 40%. So, you could easily have 2/3 of your retirement assets lost to taxes.

There are some strategies to help soften the blow of the tax bite on retirement plans. First, you can defer the income taxes as long as possible. After you reach age 70 ½, you must start taking distributions based on the “Uniform Lifetime Table.” Based on this table, you would take approximately 1/27th the first year, and slowly increasing percentages each subsequent year. For example, at age 85, your required withdrawal will be approximately 1/15th.

After your death, you can achieve the maximum stretch for the income taxation deferral by naming younger beneficiaries who can stretch the required distributions over their longer life expectancies. However, you often want to keep younger beneficiaries from having control of assets. In that situation, you can use a Family Retirement Preservation Trust™ to get the maximum stretch for distributions after your death. This trust allows you to keep the assets in trust and still use the ages of the individual beneficiaries do determine the required withdrawals.

You can also start taking withdrawals from your retirement plan and use those distributions to pay for premiums on a life insurance policy. While you need not take withdrawals until after you reach 70 ½, you may start taking withdrawals from retirement plans beginning at age 59 ½ without penalty. The life insurance policy can be owned by an irrevocable trust you set up. If done properly, the life insurance can be outside your taxable estate. This can help avoid estate taxation and converts an asset that is subject to income and estate taxation into an asset that is subject to neither.

Saving for retirement is important, as is planning for your family’s protection if something should happen to you. However, it is also important to consider how to avoid the unexpected tax trap into which retirement assets can put you. That is why intelligent retirement planning is a critical part of any effective estate plan. A qualified estate and retirement planning attorney can help you enjoy the trappings of retirement without the tax traps (www.smithbarid.com).

Blog at WordPress.com.